|To view how
participants on the whole ranked each statement, select the link to the Statement Number.
To see the rankings broken down by group, select "View results by group"
for each statement.
In answer to the question:
After reviewing the data, I believe that in order to best support Josh in reaching his goals and objectives, we need to...
We ranked the four statements in the following order of importance:
Statement Four (received 106 points)
...provide support to the teachers so that they can use existing tools and strategies to facilitate writing tasks for Josh without changing the critical elements of the activity or lowering the productivity standards of the program and then determine what tools need to be added to his system. View results by group.
Statement Two (received 80 points)
...determine how OT services can be aligned with Josh's classroom demands and make recommendations for changes in services so that they will provide the most effective classroom support for Josh. View results by group.
Statement One (received 61 points)
...make decisions about the new tools which need to be added to his writing system, acquire those tools and place them with Josh immediately so that productivity barriers will be removed. View results by group.
Statement Three (received 59 points)
...provide documentation to Josh's teachers and family members so that they will understand the legal implications of the programmatic changes that are being considered. View results by group.
[ SETT home | Site Map | Guide ]
[ NCIP Home | Library | Videos | Tour | Spotlight | Workshops | Links ]
This material was developed by the National Center to Improve Practice (NCIP), located at Education Development Center, Inc. in Newton, Massachusetts. NCIP was funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs from October 1, 1992 - September 30, 1998, Grant #H180N20013. Permission is granted to copy and disseminate this information. If you do so, please cite NCIP. Contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Education, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by NCIP, EDC, or the U.S. Government. This site was last updated in September 1998.
ŠEducation Development Center, Inc.