Title IX, addition equity

From: edequity@phoenix.edc.org
Date: Wed Apr 12 2000 - 11:53:26 EDT

  • Next message: edequity@phoenix.edc.org: "Re: democratic classrooms"

    There is always an agent provocateur in every group dedicated to civil
    rights, is my recollection from the 1960s; or a Charlie McCarthy, aptly
    named puppet of the era in which Joe McCarthy struck terror into the
    hearts of those with minds to speak, and who also spoke up. And on the
    whole it isn't worth bothering with them, except as flagpoles on which
    to run up one's own flag. Let's run up a flag, the federal law Title IX
    of the Education Amendments of 1972, the law that forbids discrimination
    in federally funded educational institutions.

    Amber (if that is indeed her/hisname), who is about to lose her last
    name because of the history of patriarchal dominance she/he is about to
    espouse) said, inter much alia, "Using proportionality of result to
    judge opportunity, if boys outnumber girls in participation, then boys
    have to lose participation opportunities. It always comes down to making
    things equal by subtraction, rather than addition."

    This is simply untrue. And it is so thoroughly untrue, because most
    cases make things better--not usually "right" even no--by addition, that
    one wants to know what the agenda behind it is. What agenda would seek
    to block equity as generally achieved by the (in my opinion)
    molasses-slow progression toward equality for girls and boys?

    Linda Purrington
    Title IX Advocates

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 12 2000 - 11:55:10 EDT