_________________________________________
Sue Sattel wrote:
>
> Understanding of what Title VII covers has just been expanded. It will take a
> while, and the right case, but understanding of what Title IX covers in sexual
> harassment will eventually be determined by justices, I am sure. The OCR
> guidance was a good beginning. Nabozny's case, using different law, is also a
> helpful decision for this issue (Ashland,WI and the resultant "high" monetary
> settlement). sue.sattel@cfl.state.mn.us
>
> _______________________ Reply Separator _______________________
>
> Subject: Oncale Case
> Author: edequity@tristram.edc.org at internet
> Date: 3/6/98 6:04 PM
>
> Does anyone know how likely it is that the
> Supreme Court's decision this week on the Oncale
> same-sex harassment case will result in cases
> arising from _sexual-orientation_ harassment?
>
> I've heard this in some of the coverage, but was
> under the impression that previously (including
> in the OCR Guidance on sexual harassment) sex-
> orientation harassment has definitely _not_ been
> covered.
>
> Thanks
> Paul Edison, Gender Issues Education
> Curriculum/Video for Grades 6-12
> <PaulEdison@aol.com>