RE: Equity in Educational Assessment

Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 10:41:44 EST

  • Next message: "RE: Kathleen Rigsby-Opening Statement"


    The numbers you cite look familiar in a lot of states--and for probably
    similar reasons. The concern I have in not necessarily the standards
    themselves which, in this state, seem to be relatively neutral. What is
    the concern is that the curricula is not aligned to the standards in many
    schools; that the same students who do not do well on norm-referenced tests
    do not do well on the performance based tests--and for many of the same
    reasons. Too many of the students' needs are not included in classroom
    practices--from learning styles, curriculum content, teacher interactions,
    teacher expectations, and other equity related issues. Simply to have
    "high standards" without the supporting instructional and curricula
    strategies is to continue to patterns we have seen. The development and
    dissemination of those strategies require time and money--and a commitment
    by policy makers that standards are for all students, not just those who
    are able to meet them by accident of birth to the "right kind of parents".

    You are correct that standards are not going to go away, and the stakes for
    meeting the standards are becoming increasingly higher and more
    politicized. The initial intent of standards as a way of increasing the
    accountability of schools for students and to insure that ALL students
    leave the K-12 educational system with all they need to succeed in the
    world of work and school was admirable. That intent seems has been lost in
    the world of political and social agendas rather that looking at how we can
    make that happen.
    Kathleen Rigsby <>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 03 2000 - 10:43:31 EST